Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanotis volubilis | (L.f.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 119 | documented |
| Stephanotis macrantha | (Klotzsch) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 6 | documented |
| Stephanotis abyssinica | (Hochst.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis acuminata | Brongn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis arabica | (Decne.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis brevisquama | (Jum. & H.Perrier) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis crinita | (Oliv.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis cuneifolia | (Tsiang & P.T.Li) Rodda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis ernstmeyeri | S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis faulknerae | (Bullock) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis floribunda | Jacques | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis grandiflora | Decne. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis robusta | (Balf.f.) Bruyns | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis rubicunda | (K.Schum.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis schimperi | (Decne.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis stellaris | (Ridl.) Rodda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis stelostigma | (K.Schum.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis taynguyenensis | (T.B.Tran & Rodda) Rodda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stephanotis thouarsii | Brongn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.