Stenostomum

Accepted species 48 Documented here 2 Family Rubiaceae

Accepted species 48 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Stenostomum acutatum DC. 7 documented
Stenostomum radiatum Griseb. 3 documented
Stenostomum abbreviatum (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum acreanum (K.Krause) Achille & Delprete 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum albobrunneum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum apiculatum Britton & Standl. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum aristatum Britton 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum aromaticum (Cast.-Campos & Lorence) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum baracoense Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum biflorum Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum cahosianum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum coriaceum (Vahl) Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum cuspidatum Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum darienense (Dwyer) C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum densiflorum C.Wright ex Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum ekmanii (Borhidi) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum ellipticum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum granulatum Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum guianensis (Bremek.) Delprete & Achille 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum heteroneurum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum imbricatum Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum involucratum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum jamaicense (Urb.) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum lucidum (Sw.) C.F.Gaertn. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum maestrense (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum minutifolium (Borhidi & Capote) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum mucronatum (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum multinerve (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum myrtifolium Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum nipense (Borhidi & O.Muñiz) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum obtusifolium (Urb.) Britton & P.Wilson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum occidentale (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum oliganthum (Urb.) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum ophiticola (Alain) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum orbiculare (Alain) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum pedicellare (Borhidi & Bisse) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum pitonianum (Urb. & Ekman) Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum portoricense Britton & P.Wilson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum resinosum (Vahl) Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum reticulare Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum revolutum Borhidi 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum rotundatum Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum scrobiculatum (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum shaferi (Urb.) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum sintenisii (Urb.) Britton & P.Wilson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum tomentosum (Sw.) DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum turrialbanum (N.Zamora & Poveda) C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Stenostomum urbanianum (C.T.White) Borhidi & M.Fernández 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.