Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stenogyne calaminthoides | A.Gray | 19 | documented |
| Stenogyne purpurea | H.Mann | 17 | documented |
| Stenogyne microphylla | Benth. | 4 | documented |
| Stenogyne angustifolia | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne bifida | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne calycosa | Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne campanulata | Weller & Sakai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne cinerea | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne cranwelliae | Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne haliakalae | Wawra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne kaalae | Wawra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne kamehamehae | Wawra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne kanehoana | O.Deg. & Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne kauaulaensis | K.R.Wood & H.Oppenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne macrantha | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne oxygona | O.Deg. & Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne rotundifolia | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne rugosa | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne scrophularioides | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne sessilis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stenogyne viridis | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.