Stenia

Accepted species 22 Documented here 1 Family Orchidaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Stenia angustilabia D.E.Benn. & Christenson 6 documented
Stenia jarae D.E.Benn. 2 below the evidence gate
Stenia aurorae D.E.Benn. & Christenson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia bismarckii Dodson & D.E.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia bohnkiana V.P.Castro & G.F.Carr 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia calceolaris (Garay) Dodson & D.E.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia christensonii D.E.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia dodsoniana Pupulin 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia falcata (Ackerman) Dressler 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia glatzii Neudecker & G.Gerlach 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia guttata Rchb.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia lillianae Jenny ex D.E.Benn. & Christenson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia luerorum D.E.Benn. & Christenson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia nataliana R.Vásquez & Nowicki & R.Müll. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia pallida Lindl. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia pastorellii D.E.Benn. 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia pustulosa D.E.Benn. & Christenson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia saccata Garay 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia stenioides (Garay) Dodson & R.Escobar 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia uribei P.Ortiz 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia vasquezii Dodson 0 below the evidence gate
Stenia wendiae D.E.Benn. & Christenson 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.