Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staelia virgata | (Willd.) K.Schum. | 7 | documented |
| Staelia thymoides | Cham. & Schltdl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia aurea | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia catolensis | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia culcita | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia domingosii | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia galioides | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia glandulosa | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia harleyi | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia hassleri | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia hatschbachii | J.H.Kirkbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia juarezii | E.L.Cabral & Salas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia longipedicellata | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia nelidae | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia paganuccii | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia reflexa | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia schumannii | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia thymbroides | (Mart. ex Mart. & Zucc.) K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia tocantinsiana | R.M.Salas & E.L.Cabral | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia uruguaya | Arechav. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Staelia vestita | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.