Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spilanthes leiocarpa | DC. | 54 | documented |
| Spilanthes urens | Jacq. | 27 | documented |
| Spilanthes alba | L'Hér. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes anactina | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes beccabunga | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes callimorpha | A.H.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes commutata | K.Koch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes costata | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes ghoshinis | Sheela | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes grandiflora | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes insipida | Jacq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes intermedia | (Rich.) DeCandolle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes leucantha | Kunth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes mauritiana | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes montana | Britton & S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes nervosa | Chodat | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes oleracea | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes paniculata | Wall. ex DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes papposa | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes paraguayensis | R.K.Jansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes pauciceps | S.F.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes pilosa | R.K.Jansen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Spilanthes sessilis | Poepp. & Endl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.