Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sphaerolobium minus | Labill. | 56 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium grandiflorum | Benth. | 16 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium medium | R.Br. | 16 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium rostratum | R.Butcher | 16 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium alatum | Benth. | 8 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium drummondii | Turcz. | 8 | documented |
| Sphaerolobium vimineum | Sm. | 4 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium hygrophilum | R.Butcher | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium pulchellum | Meisn. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium acanthos | Crisp | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium benetectum | R.Butcher | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium calcicola | R.Butcher | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium daviesioides | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium fornicatum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium gracile | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium linophyllum | (Hügel ex Benth.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium macranthum | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium nudiflorum | (Meisn.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium pubescens | R.Butcher | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium racemulosum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium scabriusculum | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sphaerolobium validum | R.Butcher | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.