Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorocea trophoides | W.C.Burger | 11 | documented |
| Sorocea bonplandii | (Baill.) W.C.Burger, Lanj. & Wess.Boer | 6 | documented |
| Sorocea affinis | Hemsl. | 5 | documented |
| Sorocea steinbachii | C.C.Berg | 3 | documented |
| Sorocea angustifolia | Al.Santos & Romaniuc | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea briquetii | J.F.Macbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea carautana | M.D.M.Vianna, Carrijo & Romaniuc | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea duckei | W.C.Burger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea ganevii | R.M.Castro | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea guilleminiana | Gaudich. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea hilarii | Gaudich. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea jaramilloi | C.C.Berg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea jureiana | Romaniuc | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea klotzschiana | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea longipedicellata | A.F.P.Machado, M.D.M.Vianna & Romaniuc | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea muriculata | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea pubivena | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea racemosa | Gaudich. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea ruminata | C.C.Berg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea sarcocarpa | Lanj. & Wess.Boer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea sprucei | (Baill.) J.F.Macbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorocea subumbellata | (C.C.Berg) Cornejo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.