Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorghum halepense | (L.) Pers. | 2,331 | documented |
| Sorghum bicolor | (L.) Moench | 235 | documented |
| Sorghum nitidum | (Vahl) Pers. | 6 | documented |
| Sorghum × almum | Parodi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum × derzhavinii | Tzvelev | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum × drummondii | (Nees ex Steud.) Millsp. & Chase | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum amplum | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum brachypodum | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum bulbosum | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum burmahicum | Raizada | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum controversum | (Steud.) Snowden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum ecarinatum | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum exstans | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum grande | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum interjectum | Lazarides | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum laxiflorum | F.M.Bailey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum macrospermum | E.D.Garber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum matarankense | E.D.Garber & Snyder | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum propinquum | (Kunth) Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sorghum virgatum | (Hack.) Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.