Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smithia purpurea | Hook. | 13 | documented |
| Smithia sensitiva | Aiton | 10 | documented |
| Smithia bigemina | Dalzell | 9 | documented |
| Smithia conferta | Sm. | 6 | documented |
| Smithia blanda | Wall. ex Wight & Arn. | 5 | documented |
| Smithia setulosa | Dalzell | 5 | documented |
| Smithia salsuginea | Hance | 3 | documented |
| Smithia abyssinica | (A.Rich.) Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia capitata | Dalzell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia ciliata | Royle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia elliotii | Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia erubescens | (E.Mey.) Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia finetii | Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia gracilis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia grandis | Benth. ex Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia hirsuta | Dalzell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia martinicensis | Spreng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia odishae | Sanjeet Kumar, Devi & R.Kr.Singh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia oligantha | Blatt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia pycnantha | Benth. ex Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia venkobarowii | Gamble | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Smithia yehii | C.M.Wang, Chih Y.Chang & Y.H.Tseng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.