Smallanthus

Accepted species 21 Documented here 7 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Smallanthus uvedalia (L.) Mack. 735 documented
Smallanthus maculatus (Cav.) H.Rob. 64 documented
Smallanthus pyramidalis (Triana) H.Rob. 54 documented
Smallanthus connatus (Spreng.) H.Rob. 13 documented
Smallanthus siegesbeckius (DC.) H.Rob. 11 documented
Smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp.) H.Rob. 11 documented
Smallanthus oaxacanus (Klatt) H.Rob. 5 documented
Smallanthus araucariophilus Mondin 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus fruticosa (Benth.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus fruticosus (Benth.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus glabratus (DC.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus jelskii (Hieron.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus lundellii H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus macroscyphus (Baker ex Baker) A.Grau 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus macvaughii (J.R.Wells) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus meridensis (Steyerm.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus microcephalus (Hieron.) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus obscurus B.L.Turner 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus parviceps (S.F.Blake) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus riograndensis Mondin 0 below the evidence gate
Smallanthus riparius (Kunth) H.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.