Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siphanthera arenaria | (DC.) Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera capillaris | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera cordata | Pohl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera cordifolia | (Benth.) Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera cowanii | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera dawsonii | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera duidae | (Gleason) Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera fasciculata | (Gleason) Almeda & O.R.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera foliosa | (Naudin) Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera glazioviana | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera gracillima | (Naudin) Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera hostmannii | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera microphylla | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera miqueliana | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera paludosa | (DC.) Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera pratensis | Markgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera ramosissima | Cogn. ex Hoehne | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera robusta | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera subtilis | Pohl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera todziae | Almeda & O.R.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera vaupesana | Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera villosa | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Siphanthera wurdackii | Almeda & O.R.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.