Sinocarum

Accepted species 19 Documented here 0 Family Apiaceae

Accepted species 19 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Sinocarum acronemifolium (C.B.Clarke) P.K.Mukh. & Constance 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum bellum (C.B.Clarke) Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum clarkeanum P.K.Mukh. & Constance 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum coloratum (Diels) H.Wolff ex F.T.Pu 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum cruciatum (Franch.) H.Wolff ex F.T.Pu 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum digitatum (Kljuykov) Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum dolichopodum (Diels) H.Wolff ex F.T.Pu 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum filicinum H.Wolff 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum latifoliolatum Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum longii M.F.Watson 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum meeboldioides Pimenov & Kljuykov 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum muliense L.J.Gui, Yan Ping Xiao & X.J.He 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum pityophilum (Diels) H.Wolff ex F.T.Pu, M.F.Watson & Holmes-Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum pulchellum C.Norman ex M.F.Watson 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum sikkimense (P.K.Mukh.) P.K.Mukh. & Constance 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum staintonianum P.K.Mukh. ex Farille & Lachard 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum vaginatum H.Wolff 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum wolffianum (Fedde ex H.Wolff) P.K.Mukh. & Constance 0 below the evidence gate
Sinocarum woodii M.F.Watson 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.