Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sindora wallichii | Benth. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora × changiensis | L.M.Choo, Loo, W.F.Ang & Er | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora affinis | de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora beccariana | Backer ex de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora bruggemanii | de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora coriacea | (Baker) Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora echinocalyx | Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora galedupa | Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora glabra | Merr. ex de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora inermis | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora irpicina | de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora javanica | (Koord. & Valeton) Backer ex K.Heyne | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora klaineana | Pierre ex Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora laotica | Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora leiocarpa | Backer ex K.Heyne & de Wit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora siamensis | Teijsm. ex Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora stipitata | Chatan & Promprom | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora sumatrana | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora supa | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora tonkinensis | A.Chev. ex K.Larsen & S.S.Larsen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sindora velutina | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.