Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seringia hillii | (F.Muell. ex Benth.) F.Muell. | 49 | documented |
| Seringia arborescens | (W.T.Aiton) Druce | 36 | documented |
| Seringia corollata | Steetz | 19 | documented |
| Seringia collina | (Domin) C.F.Wilkins & Whitlock | 10 | documented |
| Seringia nephrosperma | F.Muell. | 3 | documented |
| Seringia saxatilis | C.F.Wilkins | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia velutina | (Steetz) F.Muell. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia adenogyna | C.F.Wilkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia adenolasia | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia botak | Cheek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia cacaobrunnea | C.F.Wilkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia denticulata | (C.T.White) C.F.Wilkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia exastia | (C.F.Wilkins) C.F.Wilkins & Whitlock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia hermanniifolia | (J.Gay) F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia hookeri | F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia integrifolia | (Steud.) F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia katatona | (C.F.Wilkins) C.F.Wilkins & Whitlock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia macrantha | (Baill.) C.F.Wilkins & Whitlock | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Seringia undulata | C.F.Wilkins | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.