Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sericolea arfakensis | Gibbs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea brassii | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea calophylla | (Ridl.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea chrysotricha | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea collinsii | Coode | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea coodei | Balgooy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea decandra | A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea gaultheria | (F.Muell.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea gracilis | (Lauterb.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea leptophylla | Kaneh. & Hatus. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea micans | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea novoguineensis | Gibbs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea ovalifolia | (Wernham ex Ridl.) Gibbs | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea pachyphylla | Coode | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea papuana | (F.Muell.) Steenis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea pullei | (Lauterb.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea ridleyana | (Wernham ex Ridl.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sericolea salicina | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.