Sericanthe

Accepted species 23 Documented here 0 Family Rubiaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Sericanthe adamii (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe andongensis (Hiern) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe auriculata (Keay) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe burundensis Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe chevalieri (K.Krause) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe chimanimaniensis Wursten & De Block 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe gabonensis Sonké & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe halleana Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe jacfelicis (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe kwangoensis Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe leonardii (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe lowryana Sonké & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe mpassa Sonké & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe odoratissima (K.Schum.) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe pellegrinii (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe petitii (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe rabia Sonké & Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe raynaliorum (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe roseoides (De Wild. & T.Durand) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe suffruticosa (Hutch.) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe testui (N.Hallé) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe toupetou (Aubrév. & Pellegr.) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Sericanthe trilocularis (Scott Elliot) Robbr. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.