Scurrula

Accepted species 26 Documented here 1 Family Loranthaceae

Accepted species 26 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Scurrula parasitica L. 11 documented
Scurrula elata Danser 2 below the evidence gate
Scurrula aphodastrica Barlow 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula argentea Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula atropurpurea (Blume) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula chingii (W.C.Cheng) H.S.Kiu 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula cordifolia (Wall.) G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula corynitis G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula didyma Barlow 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula eglandulosa Rajasek. 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula ferruginea Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula fusca (Blume) G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula gongshanensis H.S.Kiu 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula gracilifolia (Schult.) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula leenhoutsii Rajasek. 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula lepidota G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula meeboldii (Gamble) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula montana Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula notothixoides Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula oortiana (Korth.) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula paramjitii L.J.Singh 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula phoebes-formosanae Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula pulverulenta (Wall.) G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula rhopalocarpa (Kurz) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula robertsonii (Gamble) Danser 0 below the evidence gate
Scurrula steenisii Rajasek. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.