Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sclerochiton apiculatus | Vollesen | 6 | documented |
| Sclerochiton harveyanus | Nees | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton triacanthus | A.Meeuse | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton bequaertii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton boivinii | (Baill.) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton coeruleus | (Lindau) S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton glandulosissimus | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton hirsutus | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton ilicifolius | A.Meeuse | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton insignis | (Mildbr.) Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton kirkii | (T.Anderson) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton nitidus | (S.Moore) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton obtusisepalus | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton odoratissimus | Hilliard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton preussii | (Lindau) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton tanzaniensis | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton uluguruensis | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sclerochiton vogelii | (Nees) T.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.