Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sciadotenia acutifolia | Krukoff & Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia amazonica | Eichler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia brachypoda | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia campestris | Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia cayennensis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia duckei | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia eichleriana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia javariensis | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia mathiasiana | Krukoff & Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia nitida | (L.Riley) Krukoff & Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia pachnococca | Krukoff & Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia paraensis | (Eichler) Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia peruviana | Krukoff & Barneby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia pubistaminea | (K.Schum.) Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia ramiflora | Eichler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia sagotiana | (Eichler) Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia solimoesana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia sprucei | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sciadotenia toxifera | Krukoff & A.C.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.