Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schwenckia americana | L. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia angustifolia | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia aurantiaca | Paucar & Stehmann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia curviflora | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia elegans | Carvalho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia glabrata | Kunth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia grandiflora | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia guianensis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia heterantha | Carvalho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia huberi | Benítez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia hyssopifolia | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia juncoides | Chodat | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia karstenii | Vatke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia lateriflora | (Vahl) Carvalho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia micrantha | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia mollissima | Nees & Mart. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia novaveneciana | Carvalho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia paniculata | (Raddi) Carvalho | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia trujilloi | Benítez | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwenckia volubilis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.