Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schwartzia adamantium | (Cambess.) Bedell ex Gir.-Cañas | 17 | documented |
| Schwartzia brasiliensis | (Choisy) Bedell ex Gir.-Cañas | 4 | documented |
| Schwartzia magnifica | (Gilg) Bedell | 4 | documented |
| Schwartzia andina | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia antioquensis | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia brenesii | (Standl.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia chocoensis | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia costaricensis | (Gilg) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia diaz-piedrahitae | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia geniculatiflora | Gir.-Cañas & Fiaschi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia jimenezii | (Standl.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia jucuensis | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia lozaniana | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia parrae | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia petersonii | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia pterosara | de Roon & Bedell ex Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia renvoizei | Gir.-Cañas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia spiciflora | (Juss.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia tarrazuensis | Hammel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schwartzia weddelliana | (Baill.) Bedell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.