Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schiedeella affinis | (C.Schweinf.) Salazar | 10 | documented |
| Schiedeella transversalis | (A.Rich. & Galeotti) Schltr. | 10 | documented |
| Schiedeella arizonica | P.M.Br. | 5 | documented |
| Schiedeella crenulata | (L.O.Williams) Espejo & López-Ferr. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella albovaginata | (C.Schweinf.) Burns-Bal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella dendroneura | (Sheviak & Bye) Burns-Bal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella dressleri | Szlach. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella esquintlensis | Szlach., Rutk. & Mytnik | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella faucisanguinea | (Dod) Burns-Bal. ex A.E.Serna & López-Ferr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella fragrans | Szlach. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella jean-mulleri | Szlach., Rutk. & Mytnik | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella nagelii | (L.O.Williams) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella pandurata | (Garay) Espejo & López-Ferr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella saltensis | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella schlechteriana | Szlach. & Sheviak | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella tamayoana | Szlach., Rutk. & Mytnik | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella trilineata | (Lindl.) Burns-Bal. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella violacea | (A.Rich. & Galeotti) Garay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedeella williamsiana | Szlach., Rutk. & Mytnik | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.