Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schiedea membranacea | H.St.John | 24 | documented |
| Schiedea trinervis | (H.Mann) Pax & K.Hoffm. | 3 | documented |
| Schiedea amplexicaulis | H.Mann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea apokremnos | H.St.John | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea attenuata | W.L.Wagner, Weller & A.K.Sakai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea diffusa | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea hawaiiensis | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea helleri | Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea hookeri | A.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea implexa | (Hillebr.) Sherff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea kealiae | Caum & Hosaka | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea ligustrina | Cham. & Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea lychnoides | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea lydgatei | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea mannii | H.St.John | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea menziesii | Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea obovata | (Sherff) W.L.Wagner & Weller | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea remyi | H.Mann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea salicaria | Hillebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea stellarioides | H.Mann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea verticillata | F.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Schiedea viscosa | H.Mann | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.