Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scaphopetalum acuminatum | Engl. & K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum amoenum | A.Chev. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum blackii | Mast. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum brunneo-purpureum | Engl. & K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum dewevrei | De Wild. & T.Durand | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum discolor | Engl. & K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum longepedunculatum | Mast. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum macranthum | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum mannii | Mast. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum ngouniense | Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum obiangianum | M.E.Leal | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum pallidinerve | Engl. & K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum parvifolium | Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum paxii | H.J.P.Winkl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum riparium | Engl. & K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum stipulosum | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum talbotii | Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum thonneri | De Wild. & T.Durand | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum vanderystii | Germ. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Scaphopetalum zenkeri | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.