Sarcolobus

Accepted species 23 Documented here 1 Family Apocynaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Sarcolobus globosus Wall. 4 documented
Sarcolobus borneensis (Steenis) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus brachystephanus (Schltr.) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus busbanianus A.Kidyoo & Kidyoo 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus cambogensis McHone & Livsh. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus carinatus Wall. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus flavus A.Kidyoo & Kidyoo 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus hullsii (F.Muell. ex Benth.) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus kaniensis (Schltr.) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus luzonensis (Warb.) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus merrillii (Schltr.) Omlor 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus oblongus Rintz 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus pepo (P.I.Forst.) S.Reuss, Liede & Meve 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus pierrei Costantin 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus porcatus P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus retusus K.Schum. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus ritae P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus rubescens P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus spathulatus P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus stenophyllus (A.Gray) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus subnudus (A.Gray) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus venulosus (A.C.Sm.) P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate
Sarcolobus vittatus P.I.Forst. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.