Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santolina africana | Jord. & Fourr. | 39 | documented |
| Santolina chamaecyparissus | L. | 15 | documented |
| Santolina rosmarinifolia | L. | 8 | documented |
| Santolina magonica | (O.Bolòs, Molin. & P.Monts.) Romo | 6 | documented |
| Santolina melidensis | (Rodr.Oubiña & S.Ortiz) Rodr.Oubiña & S.Ortiz | 3 | documented |
| Santolina neapolitana | Jord. & Fourr. | 3 | documented |
| Santolina villosa | Mill. | 6 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina pinnata | Viv. | 3 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina oblongifolia | Boiss. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina semidentata | Hoffmanns. & Link | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina ageratifolia | Asso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina benthamiana | Jord. & Fourr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina canescens | Lag. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina corsica | Jord. & Fourr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina decumbens | Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina etrusca | (Lacaita) Marchi & D'Amato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina insularis | (Gennari ex Fiori) Arrigoni | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina orocarpetana | Riv.-Guerra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina pectinata | Lag. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina tincloria | Molina, | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santolina virens | Mill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.