Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santiria apiculata | A.W.Benn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria balsamifera | Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria conferta | A.W.Benn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria dacryodifolia | Kochummen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria ebo | (Pierre) H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria grandiflora | Kalkman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria griffithii | (Hook.f.) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria havilandii | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria impressinervis | Kochummen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria kalkmaniana | Kochummen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria laevigata | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria megaphylla | Kalkman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria mollis | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria nigricans | Kochummen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria oblongifolia | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria obovata | (Pierre) H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria ridleyi | H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria rubiginosa | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria sarawakana | Kochummen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria tomentosa | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Santiria trimera | (Oliv.) Aubrév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.