Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saccharum spontaneum | L. | 200 | documented |
| Saccharum officinarum | L. | 26 | documented |
| Saccharum angustifolium | (Nees) Trin. | 11 | documented |
| Saccharum filifolium | Steud. | 5 | documented |
| Saccharum beccarii | (Stapf) Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum formosanum | (Stapf) Ohwi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum griffithii | Munro ex Aitch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum intermedium | Welker & Peichoto | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum kajkaiense | (Melderis) Melderis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum longesetosum | (Andersson) V.Naray. ex Bor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum longisetosum | Nayaran. ex Bor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum maximum | (Brongn.) Trin. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum robustum | E.W.Brandes & Jeswiet ex Grassl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum sikkimense | (Hook.f.) V.Naray. ex Bor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum sinense | Roxb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum stewartii | Rajesw., R.R.Rao & Arti Garg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum velutinum | (Holttum) Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum wardii | (Bor) Bor ex Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Saccharum williamsii | (Bor) Bor ex Cope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.