Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sabia transarisanensis | Hayata | 19 | documented |
| Sabia limoniacea | Wall. ex Hook.f. & Thomson | 5 | documented |
| Sabia swinhoei | Hemsl. | 4 | documented |
| Sabia burmanica | Water | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia campanulata | Wall. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia coriacea | Rehder & E.H.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia dielsii | H.Lév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia discolor | Dunn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia emarginata | Lecomte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia erratica | Water | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia falcata | L.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia fasciculata | Lecomte ex L.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia japonica | Maxim. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia javanica | (Blume) Backer ex L.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia lanceolata | Colebr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia nervosa | Chun ex Y.F.Wu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia paniculata | Edgew. ex Hook.f. & Thomson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia parviflora | Wall. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia pauciflora | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia purpurea | Hook.f. & Thomson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia racemosa | L.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia schumanniana | Diels | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia sumatrana | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia tomentosa | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia wardii | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sabia yunnanensis | Franch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.