Ryparosa

Accepted species 24 Documented here 0 Family Achariaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Ryparosa acuminata Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa anterides B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa baccaureoides Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa caesia Blume ex Baill. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa calotricha Mildbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa cauliflora Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa fasciculata King 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa glauca Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa hirsuta J.J.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa hullettii King 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa javanica (Blume) Kurz ex Koord. & Valeton 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa kingii King 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa kostermansii Sleumer 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa kunstleri King 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa kurrangii B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa maculata B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa maycockii B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa micromera Slooten 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa milleri B.L.Webber 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa minor Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa multinervosa Slooten 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa porcata P.F.Stevens 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa wallichii Ridl. 0 below the evidence gate
Ryparosa wrayi King 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.