Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rutidea decorticata | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea dupuisii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea ferruginea | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea fuscescens | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea gabonensis | Bridson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea glabra | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea gracilis | Bridson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea hirsuta | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea hispida | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea insculpta | Mildbr. ex Bridson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea lujae | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea membranacea | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea nigerica | Bridson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea olenotricha | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea orientalis | Bridson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea parviflora | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea rufipilis | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea seretii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea smithii | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea tenuicaulis | K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea vanderystii | Wernham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea viridiflora | Jongkind | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rutidea wieringae | O.Lachenaud | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.