Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rottboellia cochinchinensis | (Lour.) Clayton | 84 | documented |
| Rottboellia rugosa | Nutt. | 68 | documented |
| Rottboellia campestris | Nutt. | 47 | documented |
| Rottboellia tessellata | Steud. | 10 | documented |
| Rottboellia rottboellioides | (R.Br.) Druce | 7 | documented |
| Rottboellia tuberculosa | (Nash) Hitchc. | 4 | documented |
| Rottboellia selloana | Hack. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia afraurita | Stapf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia aurita | Steud. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia balansae | Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia cancellata | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia clarkei | Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia coelorachis | G.Forst. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia geminata | Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia glandulosa | Trin. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia goalparensis | Bor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia helferi | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia impressa | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia laevispica | Keng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia lepidura | (Stapf) Pilg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia paradoxa | de Koning & Sosef | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia parodiana | (Henrard) Burkart | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia purpurascens | Robyns | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rottboellia striata | Nees ex Steud. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.