Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rostellularia obtusa | Nees | 93 | documented |
| Rostellularia quinqueangularis | (J.Koenig ex Roxb.) Nees | 10 | documented |
| Rostellularia andamanica | Vasudeva Rao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia ardjunensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia backeri | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia bankaoensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia brachystachya | Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia chiengmaiensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia hijangensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia humilis | H.S.Lo | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia lanceolata | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia linearifolia | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia nagpurensis | (V.A.W.Graham) M.R.Almeida | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia ovata | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia palustris | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia psychotrioides | Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia rachaburensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia royeniana | Nees | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia serpyllifolia | (Benth. ex C.B.Clarke) Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia simplex | Wight | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rostellularia smeruensis | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.