Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ritchiea afzelii | Gilg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea agelaeifolia | Gilg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea albersii | Gilg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea aprevaliana | (De Wild. & T.Durand) R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea boukokoensis | Tisser. & Sillans | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea capparoides | (Andrews) Britten | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea carrissoi | Exell & Mendonça | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea erecta | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea gossweileri | Exell & Mendonça | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea jansii | R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea littoralis | R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea macrantha | Pax & Gilg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea mayumbensis | Exell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea noldeae | Exell & Mendonça | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea ovata | R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea pygmaea | (Gilg) DeWolf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea quarrei | R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea reflexa | (Thonn. & Schumach.) Gilg & Gilg-Ben. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea simplicifolia | Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea spragueana | Gilg & Gilg-Ben. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea wilczekiana | Bamps | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea wittei | R.Wilczek | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ritchiea youngii | Exell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.