Rhytidophyllum

Accepted species 22 Documented here 0 Family Gesneriaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Rhytidophyllum leucomallon Hanst. 2 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum tomentosum (L.) Mart. 2 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum minus Urb. 1 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum acunae C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum asperum Alain 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum auriculatum Hook. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum berteroanum Mart. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum caribaeum Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum coccineum Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum crenulatum DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum daisyanum Jiménez Rodr. & Zanoni 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum earlei (Urb. & Britton) C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum exsertum Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum grande (Sw.) Mart. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum grandiflorum Z.R.Xu & L.E.Skog ex Zanoni & Jiménez Rodr. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum lanatum Urb. & Ekman 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum lomense (Urb.) C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum petiolare DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum rhodocalyx Urb. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum rupincola (Urb.) C.V.Morton 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum vernicosum Urb. & Ekman 0 below the evidence gate
Rhytidophyllum wrightianum Griseb. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.