Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhytidophyllum leucomallon | Hanst. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum tomentosum | (L.) Mart. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum minus | Urb. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum acunae | C.V.Morton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum asperum | Alain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum auriculatum | Hook. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum berteroanum | Mart. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum caribaeum | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum coccineum | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum crenulatum | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum daisyanum | Jiménez Rodr. & Zanoni | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum earlei | (Urb. & Britton) C.V.Morton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum exsertum | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum grande | (Sw.) Mart. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum grandiflorum | Z.R.Xu & L.E.Skog ex Zanoni & Jiménez Rodr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum lanatum | Urb. & Ekman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum lomense | (Urb.) C.V.Morton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum petiolare | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum rhodocalyx | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum rupincola | (Urb.) C.V.Morton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum vernicosum | Urb. & Ekman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhytidophyllum wrightianum | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.