Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhysotoechia bifoliolata | Radlk. | 7 | documented |
| Rhysotoechia applanata | Etman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia bilocularis | Etman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia congesta | Etman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia elongata | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia etmanii | W.N.Takeuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia flavescens | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia florulenta | S.T.Reynolds | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia gracilipes | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia grandifolia | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia koordersii | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia longipaniculata | Kaneh. & Hatus. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia momiensis | Kaneh. & Hatus. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia mortoniana | (F.Muell.) Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia multiscapa | Etman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia obtusa | Etman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia ramiflora | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia robertsonii | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhysotoechia welzeniana | W.N.Takeuchi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.