Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhynchotechum discolor | (Maxim.) B.L.Burtt | 59 | documented |
| Rhynchotechum brevipedunculatum | J.C.Wang | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum alternifolium | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum burmanicum | B.M.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum calycinum | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum ellipticum | (Wall. ex D.Dietr.) A.DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum eximium | (C.B.Clarke) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum formosanum | Hatus. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum gracile | B.M.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum hookeri | (C.B.Clarke) B.M.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum lalashanense | S.S.Ying | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum longipes | W.T.Wang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum nirijuliense | Taram & D.Borah | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum obovatum | (Griff.) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum parviflorum | Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum permolle | (Nees) B.L.Burtt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum uniflorum | S.S.Ying | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum vestitum | (Griff.) Wall. ex C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhynchotechum vietnamense | B.M.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.