Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhus typhina | L. | 4,167 | documented |
| Rhus glabra | L. | 2,628 | documented |
| Rhus aromatica | Aiton | 2,488 | documented |
| Rhus copallinum | L. | 2,364 | documented |
| Rhus microphylla | Engelm. | 1,369 | documented |
| Rhus integrifolia | (Nutt.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex W.H.Brewer & S.Watson | 1,324 | documented |
| Rhus integrifolia | (Nutt.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Rothr. | 1,324 | documented |
| Rhus ovata | S.Watson | 886 | documented |
| Rhus lanceolata | (A.Gray) Britton | 547 | documented |
| Rhus virens | Lindh. ex A.Gray | 520 | documented |
| Rhus coriaria | L. | 211 | documented |
| Rhus trilobata | Nutt. | 127 | documented |
| Rhus chinensis | Mill. | 59 | documented |
| Rhus standleyi | F.A.Barkley | 31 | documented |
| Rhus michauxii | Sarg. | 23 | documented |
| Rhus schiedeana | Schltdl. | 20 | documented |
| Rhus terebinthifolia | Schltdl. & Cham. | 13 | documented |
| Rhus lentii | Kellogg | 7 | documented |
| Rhus vestita | Loes. | 6 | documented |
| Rhus hypoleuca | Champ. ex Benth. | 3 | documented |
| Rhus tepetate | Standl. & F.A.Barkley | 3 | documented |
| Rhus jaliscana | Standl. | 3 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus taitensis | Guill. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus muelleri | Standl. & F.A.Barkley | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus pachyrrhachis | Hemsl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus sandwicensis | A.Gray | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus allophyloides | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus americana | Sudw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus amherstensis | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus andrieuxii | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus arsenei | F.A.Barkley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus ashei | (Small) Greene | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus bahamensis | G.Don | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus barclayi | (Hemsl.) Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus caudata | Lauterb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus chondroloma | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus choriophylla | Wooton & Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus ciliolata | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus dhuna | Buch.-Ham. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus duckerae | F.A.Barkley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus galeottii | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus hartmanii | F.A.Barkley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus kearneyi | F.A.Barkley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus lamprocarpa | Merr. & L.M.Perry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus lenticellosa | Lauterb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus linguata | Slis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus nelsonii | F.A.Barkley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus oaxacana | Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus palmeri | Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus potaninii | Maxim. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus pre | Herbarium Practice, Following Moffett. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus pulvinata | Greene | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus punjabensis | J.L.Stewart | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus rubifolia | Turcz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus schmidelioides | Schltdl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus taishanensis | S.B.Liang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus tamaulipana | B.L.Turner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus teniana | Hand.-Mazz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhus wilsonii | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.