Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhopalocarpus similis | Hemsl. | 4 | documented |
| Rhopalocarpus alternifolius | (Baker) Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus binervius | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus coriaceus | (Scott-Elliot) Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus crassinervius | (Capuron) G.E.Schatz, Lowry & A.-E.Wolf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus excelsus | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus longipetiolatus | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus louvelii | (Danguy) Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus lucidus | Bojer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus macrorhamnifolius | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus mollis | G.E.Schatz & Lowry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus parvifolius | (Capuron) G.E.Schatz, Lowry & A.-E.Wolf | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus randrianaivoi | G.E.Schatz & Lowry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus suarezensis | Capuron ex Bosser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus thouarsianus | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus triplinervius | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhopalocarpus undulatus | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.