Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhodomyrtus tomentosa | (Aiton) Hassk. | 130 | documented |
| Rhodomyrtus psidioides | (G.Don) Benth. | 65 | documented |
| Rhodomyrtus macrocarpa | Benth. | 7 | documented |
| Rhodomyrtus effusa | Guymer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus elegans | (Blume) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus guymeriana | N.Snow & J.P.Atwood | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus kaweaensis | N.Snow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus lanata | Guymer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus locellata | (Guillaumin) Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus longisepala | N.Snow & J.McFadden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus mengenensis | N.Snow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus misimana | N.Snow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus montana | Guymer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus obovata | C.T.White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus pervagata | Guymer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus pinnatinervis | C.T.White | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus salomonensis | (C.T.White) A.J.Scott | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus sericea | Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus surigaoensis | Elmer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus takeuchii | N.Snow & J.Cantley | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus trineura | (F.Muell.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhodomyrtus verecunda | A.J.Ford & Peter G.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.