Rhodocodon

Accepted species 19 Documented here 0 Family Asparagaceae

Accepted species 19 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Rhodocodon apiculatus H.Perrier ex Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon calcicola Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon campanulatus Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon cryptopodus (Baker) Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon cyathiformis H.Perrier ex Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon floribundus H.Perrier ex Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon graciliscapus Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon intermedius H.Perrier ex Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon jackyi Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon linearifolius Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon mascarenensis (Baker) Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon monophyllus Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon perrieri Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon petrae Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon rotundus H.Perrier ex Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon rubescens Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon siederi Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon urgineoides Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Rhodocodon viridans Knirsch, Mart.-Azorín & Wetschnig 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.