Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhipsalis baccifera | (Sol. ex J.S.Muell.) Stearn | 232 | documented |
| Rhipsalis teres | (Vell.) Steud. | 27 | documented |
| Rhipsalis floccosa | Salm-Dyck ex Pfeiff. | 14 | documented |
| Rhipsalis lindbergiana | K.Schum. | 10 | documented |
| Rhipsalis elliptica | G.Lindb. ex K.Schum. | 9 | documented |
| Rhipsalis paradoxa | (Salm-Dyck ex Pfeiff.) Salm-Dyck | 9 | documented |
| Rhipsalis mesembryanthemoides | Haw. | 6 | documented |
| Rhipsalis pachyptera | Pfeiff. | 6 | documented |
| Rhipsalis micrantha | (Kunth) DC. | 4 | documented |
| Rhipsalis cereuscula | Haw. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis pacheco-leonis | Loefgr. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis trigonoides | (Doweld) N.Korotkova | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis agudoensis | N.P.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis aurea | M.F.Freitas & J.M.A.Braga | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis barthlottii | Ralf Bauer & N.Korotkova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis burchellii | Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis campos-portoana | Loefgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis cereoides | (Backeb. & Voll) Backeb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis clavata | F.A.C.Weber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis crispata | (Haw.) Pfeiff. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis cuneata | Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis dissimilis | (G.Lindb.) K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis ewaldiana | Barthlott & N.P.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis flagelliformis | N.P.Taylor & Zappi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis goebeliana | Backeb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis grandiflora | Haw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis hileiabaiana | (N.P.Taylor & Barthlott) Barthlott & N.Korotkova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis hoelleri | Barthlott & N.P.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis juengeri | Barthlott & N.P.Taylor | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis neves-armondii | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis oblonga | Loefgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis occidentalis | Barthlott & Rauh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis olivifera | N.P.Taylor & Zappi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis ormindoi | N.P.Taylor & Zappi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis pentaptera | Pfeiff. ex A.Dietr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis pilocarpa | Loefgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis pittieri | Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis platycarpa | (Zucc.) Pfeiff. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis pulchra | Loefgr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis puniceodiscus | G.Lindb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis rhombea | (Salm-Dyck) Pfeiff. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis riedeliana | Regel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis russellii | Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis shaferi | Britton & Rose | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis spathulata | Otto ex Sweet | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis sulcata | F.A.C.Weber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis triangularis | Werderm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Rhipsalis tucumanensis | F.A.C.Weber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.