Rhaphidostichum

Accepted species 22 Documented here 0 Family Sematophyllaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Rhaphidostichum acestrostegium (Sull.) W.R.Buck 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum brevisetum E.B.Bartram 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum bunodicarpum (Müll.Hal.) M.Fleisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum clemensiae Nog. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum dubium Dixon 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum glaucovirens (Mitt.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum gracile Dixon 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum leptocarpoides (Broth.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum leptocarpum M.Fleisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum loriforme (Broth. & Geh.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum macromonostictum J.Froehl. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum pallidifolium Dixon 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum picobonitum B.H.Allen 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum piliferoides J.Froehl. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum piliferum (Broth.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum pullei Dixon 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum pustulatum Hoe 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum replicatum (Hampe) M.Fleisch. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum schwaneckeanum (Müll.Hal.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum subleptocarpum (Thér. & P.de la Varde) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum theliporum (Müll.Hal.) Broth. 0 below the evidence gate
Rhaphidostichum tutezonum B.H.Allen 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.