Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retiniphyllum cataractae | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum chloranthum | Ducke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum concolor | (Spruce ex Benth.) Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum discolor | (Spruce ex Benth.) Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum francoanum | Cortés-Ballén | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum fuchsioides | K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum glabrum | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum guianense | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum kuhlmannii | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum laxiflorum | (Benth.) N.E.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum longiflorum | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum maguirei | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum parvifolium | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum pauciflorum | Kunth ex K.Krause | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum pilosum | (Spruce ex Benth.) Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum scabrum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum schomburgkii | (Benth.) Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum secundiflorum | Bonpl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum speciosum | (Spruce ex Benth.) Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum tepuiense | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Retiniphyllum truncatum | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.