Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raveniopsis abyssicola | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis aracaensis | Kallunki & Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis breweri | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis campinicola | Kallunki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis capitata | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis cowaniana | Steyerm. & Luteyn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis fraterna | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis jauaensis | Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis linearis | (Gleason) R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis microphyllus | K.Wurdack | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis necopinata | Kallunki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis nubicola | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis paruana | (R.S.Cowan) R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis peduncularis | Pittier & Lasser | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis ruellioides | (Oliv.) R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis sericea | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis stelligera | (R.S.Cowan) R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis steyermarkii | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis tomentosa | Gleason | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raveniopsis trifoliolata | R.S.Cowan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.