Raphiocarpus

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Gesneriaceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Raphiocarpus annamensis (Pellegr.) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus asper (Drake) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus aureus (Dunn) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus axillaris D.J.Middleton 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus begoniifolius (H.Lév.) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus bicallosus C.H.Nguyen, Aver. & F.Wen 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus clemensiae (Pellegr.) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus discolor F.Wen, Z.B.Xin & L.B.Ji 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus evrardii (Pellegr.) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus jinpingensis W.H.Chen & Y.M.Shui 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus longipedunculatus (C.Y.Wu ex H.W.Li) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus macrosiphon (Hance) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus maguanensis Y.M.Shui & W.H.Chen 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus petelotii (Pellegr.) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus sesquifolius (C.B.Clarke) B.L.Burtt 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus sinicus Chun 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus sinovietnamicus Z.B.Xin, L.X.Yuan & T.V.Do 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus tamdaoensis Phuong, Xuyen & Y.G.Wei 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus taygiangensis C.H.Nguyen, K.S.Nguyen & Aver. 0 below the evidence gate
Raphiocarpus tonkinensis T.V.Do 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.