Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raphia australis | Oberm. & Strey | 27 | documented |
| Raphia farinifera | (Gaertn.) Hyl. | 6 | documented |
| Raphia africana | Otedoh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia diasticha | Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia gabonica | S.Mogue, Sonké & Couvreur | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia gentiliana | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia hookeri | G.Mann & H.Wendl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia laurentii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia longiflora | G.Mann & H.Wendl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia mannii | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia matombe | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia monbuttorum | Drude | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia palma-pinus | (Gaertn.) Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia regalis | Becc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia rostrata | Burret | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia ruwenzorica | Otedoh | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia sese | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia sudanica | A.Chev. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia taedigera | (Mart.) Mart. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia textilis | Welw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia vinifera | P.Beauv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raphia zamiana | S.Mogue, Sonké & Couvreur | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.