Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raoulia australis | Hook.f. ex Raoul | 237 | documented |
| Raoulia tenuicaulis | Hook.f. | 208 | documented |
| Raoulia glabra | Hook.f. | 176 | documented |
| Raoulia grandiflora | Hook.f. | 169 | documented |
| Raoulia hookeri | Allan | 169 | documented |
| Raoulia subsericea | Hook.f. | 156 | documented |
| Raoulia eximia | Hook.f. | 78 | documented |
| Raoulia monroi | Hook.f. | 74 | documented |
| Raoulia albosericea | Colenso | 58 | documented |
| Raoulia bryoides | Hook.f. | 58 | documented |
| Raoulia buchananii | Kirk | 42 | documented |
| Raoulia rubra | Buchanan | 41 | documented |
| Raoulia parkii | Buchanan | 36 | documented |
| Raoulia mammillaris | Hook.f. | 30 | documented |
| Raoulia beauverdii | Cockayne | 23 | documented |
| Raoulia haastii | Hook.f. | 23 | documented |
| Raoulia apicinigra | Kirk | 19 | documented |
| Raoulia youngii | (Hook.f.) Beauverd | 14 | documented |
| Raoulia petriensis | Kirk | 5 | documented |
| Raoulia subulata | Hook.f. | 4 | documented |
| Raoulia goyenii | Kirk | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia chiliastra | Mattf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia cinerea | Petrie | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia gibbsii | Cheeseman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia hectorii | Hook.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia loganii | Cheeseman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Raoulia planchonii | (Hook.f.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.