Radermachera

Accepted species 17 Documented here 2 Family Bignoniaceae

Accepted species 17 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Radermachera sinica (Hance) Hemsl. 53 documented
Radermachera xylocarpa (Roxb.) Roxb. ex K.Schum. 35 documented
Radermachera quadripinnata (Blanco) Seem. 2 below the evidence gate
Radermachera ramiflora Steenis 1 below the evidence gate
Radermachera boniana Dop 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera coriacea Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera eberhardtii Dop 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera frondosa Chun & F.C.How 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera gigantea (Blume) Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera glandulosa (Blume) Miq. 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera hainanensis Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera inflata Steenis 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera microcalyx C.Y.Wu & W.C.Yin 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera peninsularis Steenis 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera pentandra Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera stellata Steenis 0 below the evidence gate
Radermachera yunnanensis C.Y.Wu & W.C.Yin 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.